Stonewall Residents Against Blended Development & Mixed Lot Sizes

Comments

#10

Major infrastructure concerns on an already stressed town

Zachary Arrington (Stonewall, 2021-02-03)

#12

I am signing this because this would be a heavier burden on your drainage, sewer, roads and schools. The type of neighborhood this company builds is not what stonewall needs!

Rachal Fetty (Stonewall, 2021-02-03)

#14

Infrastructure is poor. Stonewall/Frierson road continues to be full of potholes which are only continuously patched and that is not a feasible solution. The Legislator in this area has already stated that they would not be fixing the Stonewall Frierson Road anytime soon due to lack of funds. Drainage is already an issue within Cathey Acres and drainage will continue to be an issue with an increase in disruption of ground/building. Traffic on the Stonewall Frierson Road is horrible and people are having to wait more than 30 minutes to get out of the neighborhood already without a stop light in place and there are no funds to purchase a stoplight.

Bradly McCollum (Stonewall, 2021-02-03)

#28

Our beyond horrible streets aren’t being repaired properly, only patched up. We have areas that flood whenever it rains heavy. Then our poor schools are already overflowing with students. Our stonewall police department was done away with so therefore the crime rate will certainly rise, hence the Progressive Bank robbery on February 19, 2020, and there’s been many incidents where homeowners property have been damaged or stolen. These are just some of our concerns...there are many more.

Beverly & Michael Tyler (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#36

Don't want school and infrastructure overloads in city

Marc Jorgensen (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#41

I value our home, schools and small town feel. There is a standard here, let’s not become Shreveport!

Kerry Staniford (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#54

It is too crowded here in stonewall! Highway 3276 road is the pitts. The state doesn't keep the maintenance like they should. If you increase the amount of houses allowed on 1 acre will only worsen the roads and the school system. We are over loaded in the schools and the traffic is too high. It will worsen if the make it a 'service road' for I-69.

Starra Keen (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#60

The house market in Stonewall and surrounding areas is already over-saturated. I agree with all economical strains mentioned above and also want to protect my property value.

Rebecca Lane (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#62

The road condition on that highway are too bad...

Linda Smith (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#63

Protecting my home values

James Martin (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#76

The infrastructure in Stonewall is already at max capacity. We need to slow down the growth. The small town feeling is quickly disappearing.

Bronwyn Sanders (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#77

I don’t believe the city of stonewall can handle all the influx of people this would bring at the pace it would happen.

Jared Jennings (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#84

To protect our property values

Tina Martin (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#85

This will back right up to my property.

Beth Shinault (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#88

I do not want to lose value on our home.

Jennifer Pace (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#89

I don’t fill like this would benefit the community, the parish can not meet the needs of the people we already have and this would make it even worse the only ones it would help would be the developers and contractors

Robert Mayes (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#93

Numerous reason from school overload to drainage issues to the size of homes being built, if it has an affect on my property value being decreased then I’m am totally against it , if the city wants a new neighborhood then it should be done so that the home are done similar to the surrounding neighborhoods and not 4-6 homes being built on a single acre, RIDICULOUS

Russell Thames (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#95

Dont approve of the new neighborhood

Walter Williams (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#96

There are so many reasons to be against this.

Steven Almond (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#105

I am against development next to the Cathy Acres subdivision for the following reasons.
*our schools are already overcrowded
*it will put a strain on our water and sewerage
*drainage is horrible now so adding more obstacles in its path will slow it even more.
*our neighborhood has a lot of traffic now so there shouldn’t be thoroughfare from outside.
*the roads in stonewall are horrific, ie it would put even more stress on stonewall/Frierson rd.
*it WILL hurt the property value of all who are here now.
Chief Troy Kerry

Chief Troy Kerry (Stonewall, 2021-02-04)

#107

ProtectIng my home value

Grant Killough (Stonewall, 2021-02-05)

#115

Stonewall-Frieson Road is already heavily trafficked and in poor condition. It will burden our already
poor water and drainage system.

Shelia Davis (Stonewall, 2021-02-05)

#120

I do not want 1/4 acre or smaller lots developed near Cathy Acres and the road maintenance can’t support the extra traffic

Robert Hicks (Stonewall, 2021-02-05)

#123

Infrastructure is not prepared for large number of houses.

Jon Pat Clemons (Stonewall, 2021-02-05)

#125

I moved to Stonewall 22 years ago because of it size and proximity to Shreveport. I'm unhappy about the rate of growth in Stonewall especially in recent years. Seriously considering moving...

Lei Sistrunk (Stonewall, 2021-02-05)

#130

We need a grocery store and better roads not 4-6 homes on an acre.

Wade Britt (Stonewall, 2021-02-05)

#133

It’s not good for stonewall!!!

Brett Fetty (Stonewall, 2021-02-06)

#136

DO Not want small lot size housing! Schools are already overcrowded!

Richard Rambin (Stonewall, 2021-02-06)

#149

This will not be good for the infrastructure or schools for DeSoto Parish.

Fran Kerry (Stonewall, LA, 2021-02-09)



Paid advertising

We will advertise this petition to 3000 people.

Learn more...