SAVE the BUSHMANS ESTUARY PETITION
Comments
#1201
I want to save Bushman’s EstuaryTracy Cox (2024-12-24)
#1202
I want to save our beach.Gary Hartman (2024-12-24)
#1205
Rose’s proposal is an exercise in self interest with no informed environmental considerations whatsoever taken into accountChris Baker (2024-12-24)
#1209
I do not want the Bushmansriver Estuary to be destroyed!Mardia Niehaus (2024-12-24)
#1210
I’m signing this because the nature process should be taken preference over one individual ideologyJonathan Hamp-Adams (2024-12-24)
#1217
The plan is ABSURD and will ruin the Bushmans River mouth and estuary, only to satisfy the greedy wants of a handful of people.JURGEN POTGIETER (2024-12-24)
#1218
Because of the threat to Bushmans Estuary which is already silting up.I am a permanent resident of Kenton and I am also concerned that certain individuals appear to somehow have influenced Ndlambe municipal officials for their own selfish interests without any regard for the good of Kenton.
Geoffrey Bennett (2024-12-24)
#1220
Puta the estuary in dangerTheo Landman (2024-12-24)
#1223
I disagree with the Rose proposalJonathan Bouwer (2024-12-24)
#1225
I love the oceanmichelle mulol (2024-12-24)
#1228
I am opposed to the planDeidre Thompson (2024-12-24)
#1230
Moving the sand will destroy the river. It is a progression of nature you cannot stop what will happen. The sand will eventually choke the river mouth.Penny Philip (2024-12-24)
#1234
It is of critical importance that the estuary is protected and nature is preserved.Maria Botha (2024-12-24)
#1235
No consideration for the environmental disaster which will resultLiz Baker (2024-12-24)
#1240
I am a resident of Bushmans with a view of the part of the river that is being spoilt with the excess sand from the Kenton side.This a poor situation where one man can create a potential enormous environmental problem!!EWVZ
Gary Loader (2024-12-24)
#1243
Please don’t interfere with the natural wind flow in The Bushmans / Kenton conservancyMartin Du Plessis (2024-12-24)
#1248
Im signing this because if this is allowed it will close up the river mouth of Boesmansriver which will have a detrimental effect on the natural ecology and tourism of the little townMichelle Du Plessis (2024-12-24)
#1249
Great planNicole Jordan (2024-12-24)
#1278
You can't beat nature. The solution must be in line with the natural movement of sand through dry bones valleyNorbert Wegner (2024-12-26)
#1286
I do not believe that the sand should be moved.Ryan Hackney (2024-12-26)
#1287
I am a family member of a resident on Bushman's River Villiage, a holiday maker, and I'm against the arrangement between KSDNA and Ndlambe.Edwin Basson (2024-12-26)
#1295
Save the Seahorses in the EstuariesTheresa Ravenscroft (2024-12-26)
#1296
I am signing because the KSDNA plan is ill conceived and does not consider the overall well-being of the whole village.Francois Wolf (2024-12-27)
#1299
I do not want the unnecessary moving of sand dunes that was not studied scientifically. Nature should be allowed to takes its course. I moved here to enjoy a restfull retirement. These plans will wreak my living pleasure.Lorinda Frylinck (2024-12-27)
#1304
Because I care about the future ecological wellbeing of Kenton on seaMark Weissenborn (2024-12-27)
#1305
It is unacceptable to undertake such an operation without a valid Environmental Impact Study.Denise Alcock (2024-12-27)
#1306
Due to the negative environmental impact I believe this will have.Zita Lobban (2024-12-27)
#1310
Leave the beaches alone!Carissa Webster (2024-12-27)
#1311
The removal of the sand needs to be done naturally by removing all the vegetation in DBV that has been planted to prevent the sand from moving naturally not by carting trucks loads of sand through the town damaging the newly paved roadsLiz Thomas (2024-12-27)
#1314
One wealthy person does not have the right to force unknown costs on future generations, simply to protect his ocean viewAndrew Riddin (2024-12-27)
#1319
NRVAEdwina Hough (2024-12-28)
#1320
I think it’s wrong what they are trying to doJohannes Strydom (2024-12-28)
#1323
Let nature takes its courseAndre Engelbrecht (2024-12-28)
#1327
Fighting sand movement is futile and watefulMarie Koster (2024-12-28)
#1332
Nature 'P'reservistT Swart (2024-12-29)
#1333
I would like to protect the natural coastline.Kerryn Botha (2024-12-30)
#1337
I am signing in favour of the Bushman's estuary petition as one cannot interfere with the way nature works. Nature will win at the long run.Marina Matthews (2024-12-30)
#1339
Devastation of coastlineCarol Hayward (2024-12-30)
#1340
1. A complete/comprehensive environmental impact study has not been duly completed.2. Residents/rate payers have not given sufficient opportunity to give an input.
3. The existing ecology will be negatively impacted.
4. The intervention is not self sustaining and thus not to the benefit of the Estuary.
5. The pollution(noise, carbon footprint, destruction of the established nature reserve and other ecological habitats) will negatively impact environment and the long term biodiversity of the Estuary and surrounding environments.
6. All of the above will have a negative economic impact (reduced tourism, need to restore natural habitats, cost to sustain).
Lana Anne Meyer (2024-12-31)
#1347
The Bushman’s area is one of the few where nature rolls at its own pace, ebbing and flowing. This plan by a few selfish, ignorant people without proper ecological studies or consideration for the road structure and quality of lifer for the rest of the community should not continue without all appropriate studies and impact reports.Bron Schultz (2025-01-02)
#1348
Object to the moving of the sand down which will cause Bushmans River mouth to close downElizabeth Nel (2025-01-02)
#1349
I am anti loaders and trucks in the streets of KentonWilliam Hatfield (2025-01-02)
#1354
Stupid idea and will destroy the beautiful riversideLeon Erasmus (2025-01-02)
#1356
I am a resident of the area.Natasha Moolman (2025-01-03)
#1362
I am against the proposed plan due its impact on the environment within Kenton. Further engagement with the broader Kenton community is required.Adrian Appel (2025-01-03)
#1365
Dunes can't be contained and controlledIt hoes against natures cycle
Deborah-Ann Alexander (2025-01-04)
#1368
I’m signing because a well thought out plan to remain sustainable is neededKevin Austin (2025-01-06)
#1371
I don’t believe we should interfere with nature. Don’t move the dune for rich peopleLiana Turner (2025-01-06)
#1377
It is ludicrous that we want to interfere with nature and that because some fool wants to see the mouthMarian MCFARLANE (2025-01-08)
#1382
I object to the eco system tampering within the area.Derek Whitton (2025-01-09)
#1385
To save this natural habitat and its wildlifeSimone Damaske (2025-01-09)
#1392
It will be the end of the riverGuy More (2025-01-15)
#1394
I believe the planting of shrubs and the cloth netting will cause more of a hindrance than if it were naturally filtering through DBV.Paul Wansbury (2025-01-15)
#1399
I am signing because this should not be done to this place close to Kenton-On-Sea it is wrong.Elizabeth Swart
Elizabeth Swart (2025-02-05)