Not for CPK
All people who want to support our protest from all over Poland and the world are invited to sign the petition.
All persons and institutions wishing to support our protest against the construction of a mega airport and the opposed CPK project are welcome on our facebook profiles
Site:
https://www.facebook.com/poland.noise.pollution
Groups:
We Inhabitants of the southern poviats of the Mazowieckie voivodship call on the authorities of Centralny Port Komunikacyjny Sp. z o . o . i.e. a State Treasury company established under art. 11 of the Act of May 10, 2018 on the Central Communication Port (Journal of Laws 2018/1089) to cease operations aiming to build a mega airport in the following counties of Warsaw West, Grodziski, Pruszkowski, Żyrardowski, Piaseczyński, and Sochaczewski.
We strongly and unanimously protest against the planned construction of a mega airport, the so-called An air hub with a capacity of up to 100 million passengers per year . So it's the number of passengers that all airports in Poland together service. The planned investment poses health hazards for the inhabited population, i.e. air noise from aircraft - airplanes on the apron but above all taking off and landing, i.e. approaching landing at low altitudes. The radius of impact of the airport of this capacity is about 50 kilometers. In addition, harmful gases, exhaust fumes emitted by aircraft - airplanes and hot air megatons that will promote the formation of so-called caps - a layer of hot air that maintains smog and does not allow it to disperse. About 700,000 people live in the above-mentioned poviats together with their families with whom no public consultations about mega airport were conducted.
The size and type of impact of CPK investments is directly related to catastrophic effects on the natural environment and health of the residents of all poviats, including adjacent cities such as Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Milanówek, Pruszków, Brwinów, Ożarów Mazowiecki, Błonie, Mszczonów, Tarczyn, Sochaczew, Podkowa Leśna and others and all villages not mentioned under the influence.
The fact that Centralny Port Komunikacyjny Sp. z o. o. and the originators of the government, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland, the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, did not carry out any referendum on the design and construction of the poviats listed above. There were also no public consultations with 700 thousand people living in the southern poviats of the province. Warsaw which will be under the direct influence of the planned mega CPK airport. Such action is not in accordance with the Constitution and the basic principles of social coexistence, and conventions in force in the European Union such as:
Aarhus Convention (Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, signed on 25 June 1998 in Aarhus, Denmark, during the 4th Pan-European Conference of Ministers for Environmental Protection. The Convention entered into force on 30 October 2001) OJ 2003 No. 78, item 706
http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20030780706
The European Landscape Convention, drawn up in Florence on October 20, 2000, a multilateral agreement adopted under the Council of Europe on October 20, 2000 in Florence , ratified by Poland in 2004. The main purpose of the Convention is to promote activities for landscape , its protection, management and planning. and organizing European cooperation in this area
http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20060140098
With the emphasis on the fact that currently there is no airborne noise measurement system made available in real time to the society living around airport areas in the country. These deficiencies and the lack of a consistent aviation noise protection program constitute a flagrant failure to comply with Directive 2002/49 / EC (Environmental Noise Directive - END) of the European Parliament and Council of Europe of 25 June 2002 regarding noise assessment and management in environment.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32002L0049
Activities aimed at displacing the local population for the amounts imposed from above by Centralny Port Komunikacyjny Sp. z o. o. and the so-called spec act that is not in accordance with European Union law is a blatant attempt to take property and land from local people.
The process, legislation on the adoption of the Act of 10 May 2018 on the Central Communications Port was carried out without public consultations about mega airport in municipalities affected by the investment, e.g. by aircraft traffic on low altitiude on the way to landing and taking off from a mega airport. It is also a violation of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention.
http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20180001089
We urge the Government of the Republic of Poland to withdraw from the construction and continue the project and investment plan in the southern Warsaw poviats due to the harmfulness to the environment and health and life of our community.
We strongly protest and we are against the construction of the Central Airport
Probably nobody told you or showed what you read, you'll see below.
This is because where there is a lot of money at stake, the public is not informed about the harmfulness of the projects being carried out to human health and life.
See how harmful the noise from the mega airport is and how it destroys children's health
Below we present our community with data that present the impact harmful to human health and destructive to the natural environment.
1. Optional location of the runways and the noise disturbing zone.
What were the plans as before? They criticized the construction of one huge mega airport and recommended the expansion of local ports such as Modlin, Radom etc. In Poland, there are many airports that can be connected by a high-speed rail network with currently huge amounts of EU subsidies. look the study under the link below. Moreover, dispersed airports in the country do not generate accumulated pollution. Their availability and nearby access from each region is also important. There is no need to travel to one mega port and generate additional traffic pollution.
See what will do your of neighborhood CPK mega airport comparable with Heatrow from Great Britain to about 100 million passengers.
below a film about the airport (EPWA) F. Chopin Okęcie in Warsaw.
What will harmful air noise look like? See the movies below.
See how air noise affects people within about 6 miles of a mega airport
What do children think about planes and noise? See how life and suffering of children near the mega airport due to air noise looks like.
How does the life of people look like in the vicinity of the mega airport. What is the emission of harmful noise?
Beautiful house for sale, however, has a small drawback because the area is a not far from mega airport that generates mega harmful noise.
Mega airport it's a very wide areas around the airport in which aircraft constantly wait for landing emitting harmful gases and noise.
Aircraft noise is just as harmful as smog. See how destructive it destroys your health of the mega airport with harmful noise.
2. Emission of harmful toxic compounds from aircraft engines and hot air heating the layer of atmosphere capable of blocking air circulation and maintaining smog. 130,000 Kg of hot air is emitted from only one engine.
Exhaust gas turbine engines contain: nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (UHC) and solid particles (PM). These compounds, as a result of further photochemical reactions occurring in the atmosphere, cause a number of adverse phenomena (acid rain, photochemical smog, increase in tropospheric ozone concentration
e.t.c.).
3. Air circulation and air sources of pollutants that cause smog
A layer of "Warm Air" hot air, e.g. created by planes taking off and landing at a mega airport.
4. In the current winter season of 2019/2020 permissible standards of PM dust pollution in the Mazowieckie voivodship have reached values exceeding 1300%. for PM 2.5 340 ug / m3 and 518 ug / m3 for PM 10. For example, currently air traffic from the Okęcie airport is directed mainly to the south, where during the smog the highest concentrations of PM dust occur. It does not take place over Warsaw.
Although it is estimated that globally, air transport generates only 2% of global greenhouse gas emissions, around 6% nitrogen oxides and less than 1% sulfur oxides [6], the problem of these emissions cannot be ignored because it contributes to some degree of deterioration air and affects environmental elements
ska (soil erosion, destruction of the stand, disturbances in photosynthesis of plants), as well as on human health (allergic diseases, chronic diseases and respiratory dysfunctions), which may be a problem in regions characterized by high air traffic. In addition, due to high concentrations of solid particles (PM2.5) and tropospheric ozone, emitted by gliders
in built-up areas, about five thousand premature deaths of people living within a 20 km radius of the airport are reported annually, and oversized concentrations of respirable dust and other solid particles adsorbing on its surface numerous carcinogens and heavy metals cause global losses estimated at about 20 billion dollars a year
We also publish articles from local media that testify to the public's protest and unwillingness to invest in a mega airport driven by force by the Polish Government based on the spec of the CPK Act. Links to click and read below.
- Baranów airport - what will the inhabitants lose, what can the economy gain?
- Argument about the megalotno. The mayor is afraid of noise. "Dramatize you"
- Mazovia criticizes the megalotno. "Let's not repeat the mistakes of the West"
- CPK: Let's take a big step back. Until it's too late!
- Here is stubble for now, but there will be an airport
- "One big noise, stench." The inhabitants of the Baranów commune are devastated by the construction of CPK
- We know the results of the referendum in Baranów. Residents almost unanimous
For comparison, the following is the environmental impact and impact on people of comparable airports - mega airports with a capacity of 100 million passengers in the UK. Please note how huge the area of impact and nuisance of noise and pollution is.
UK Heathrow Airport equivalent to the future mega CPK airport
Take-off paths and the noise emission area they occupy.
Animation depicting the immission of aircraft noise - an aircraft approaching landing and the area of its nuisance and impact.
We present a real monitoring system for noise and impact of London Airport Gatwick. No such airport in Poland makes this system publicly available. In Great Britain, unlike Poland, the EU END directive has been implemented and the public can take full advantage of information that is public and up-to-date represented in real time.
How harmful is traveling by plane to the environment?
How much the aviation industry pollutes Europe
Publications also from the world of science on aircraft harmfulness and emissions.
- Planes are damaging the climate more than it seemed
- Planes will do more harm. It's not just CO2
- Shocking WHO report: Toxic air in aircraft causes a number of diseases!
- Air Transport
- The dirty secret of toxic air in art aircraft in English
- Forget about plastic the problem is elsewhere art. English
- Time to wake up - the harmful effects of aviation art. English
- Noise - it poisons us just like toxic air
- Why noise is bad for your health. English
- About noise
- Impact of noise on human health
- How noise damages you
- Should domestic flights disappear? Expert: it's an unnecessary environmental poison
- Are you flying on a weekend by plane? You put 100 kg of carbon dioxide on our heads
- A flight to London harms the climate as much as four months by car
- Corona virus is spreading thanks to airplanes
Good advice for a good climate
- What can you do for the climate? Restrict air travel
- Before you fly, check how much CO2 your flight will produce
- # author Jacek Uryniuk 14.12.2019 15:54 Are you going on a long journey through the country? If you want to do something for the climate, take the train GUIDES 0 Because of emissions, rail is a better choice than an airplane or a car
- Can a train replace an airplane? "People are getting louder and louder that you need to clean it up"
- exemplary parliamentarian example
The Polish version of petition
Poland Noise Pollution Contact the author of the petition