#23: -

The most consistent aspect of what they do is subterfuge and lies. The common has always looked more or less as it does now. It has not been managed before in the way that they propose; manage is a derogotary term as no one has intentionally subjected the place to the imposition that it now is threatened with.

Please pass on these facts to whoever you can, thank you for commenting, these actions have to stop as this is the most wonderful space that we have locally. It will be an artificial landscape with NO ecological benefit.

Thanks, Steve.

#24: steve mccarron - Re: sanity in our open spaces

Steve,

I wish you well in fighting this environmental vandalism.

Here in Surrey and neighbouring Hampshire & West Sussex, thousands of acres of woodland (most of it naturally regenerating) have been decimated since 1998 (when "SPAs" were first designated).

In addition to massive loss of wildlife caused by the deforestation (there is not much left alive after the bulldozers beloved by organisations such as the National Trust, Surrey Wildlife Trust and the MOD go in, and which is often followed by soaking the land with glyphosate and asulox herbicides); many of the areas also now burn every time there is a dry spell (which is more and more often here).

The Forestry Commission recently published stats on woodland loss stating that (at least) around 10,000 acres of woodland have been destroyed in the pursuit of "open habitats" since 1997. However this will not be classed as permanent loss until 10 years of deforestation have been confirmed.

In most cases there were no consultations, and such consultations that have taken place have been a sham, either by circulating publicity to as few people as possible or by the ignoring of the responses of local people, so I fear your resistance is destined to fail.

Good luck anyway.

Surrey resident.