I know exactly what needs to be done. Forget Mr R Gough and what he said, says or writes and put the extra 200, 300 (or think of a number) of school places that are needed in Sittingbourne in an area where the children live. Or perhaps as many parents are happy to drive, the Kent Education committee may find that land is cheaper in perhaps Leysdown or Elmley. As some Sittingbourne children have already been offered Secondary school placements out of area I would assume that these parents will also be happy to do 10/20 mile round trips twice a day if allocated these places! Food for thought!
We in the Tunstall area should also give a thought to residents that live in the cul-de-sac that serves Landsdown School and their increase in traffic when that school is enlarged. No new developments there also.

#315: - R Gough's wise words ? ! ? !

Alternatively, all the objectors from Tunstall could simply move further into the countryside to maintain their rural living experience.