Cannabis Farmers Council Petition

I would like to add one comment/suggestion regarding amending another WAC rule to protect processors from unwarranted product returns. In other words, if there is no proof of tainted or 'unsellable' product, the processor should have the option to take back the product in question and convert it to another sellable product within their capabilities. This may not be a situation that was foreseen at the time of rule-making, but it has occurred more than a few times across the state, due to managerial decisions re positioning of products on store shelves. "Good enough" product should be allowed to be converted into another good enough, or even better, product for market. If it requires case-by-case approval from one's inspector, so be it. But adding insult to injury by requiring the processor to destroy perfectly fine product (current rule), due to politics, etc, should not be acceptable.